And your total is: $50.00, now let me repeat that: Fifty dollars and no cents.
And don't forget the 0 cents, get it right and you'll get a 0 cent tip (or would that be a 0 cents tip?).
Look, if we're going to go to all that trouble for nothing, why not just make it $49.99?
Sure, you make one less penny, but what do you suppose all the computers think about so many useless numbers floating around?
Oh, and what about all those printers printing out endless lines of meaningless zeros, I think they could use a break.
Think about it; $49.99 takes about the same amount of ink as $50.00, sure, you lose a penny, but you give the printer the peace of mind that it's accomplishing something.
And of course we have to spell it out for those who can't trust digits; "And 0 cents", "And 00/100ths dollars", and nothing to the right of the dot, period.
Don't forget the wasteful dot, we save another drop since we don't need that stupid dot in there either.
And then there are those printers that put that slash through the Ø to make sure we know there's nothing there.
Just think how much we'd save by shortening it to just $50, Fifty dollars, that's it, just Five Zero. Not only do you save some ink, you make an extra penny.
Sorry, but Microsoft doesn't pay me enough to fix their browser.
The remote has a button for ejecting the CD tray, but no power on/ off button.
Some people must really have to think about that one, I noticed it right off.
Sometimes I am asked about a computer problem, and when the problem is explained to me I fail to comprehend the problem.
This problem is often caused by them doing something, or clicking some pop-up box or "wizard" that apparently disables some program.
And I usually fail to see the problem, and so I usually don't give the right solution, and I'm going to try to explain why.
The real problem lies in the fact that MS tries to hide the file system and awkwardly tries to create a friendly interface for the novice computer user.
While that is perfectly fine, the problem lies in the method.
The "Desktop" seems, for many people, to be a place where most often used programs seem to reside, and if it isn't there then there seems to be a problem finding it.
Now I have to think back to the very first time I saw Windows 95, there wasn't much on the Desktop, but I wanted to open something, so there was the Start button, but surely I didn't want to "start" anything, I didn't want to mess anything up.
Now that seems really silly to me now, but I have to think back to that state of mind because that is the root of the problem, though I may fail at explaining it here.
Now MS seems to think that the file system is not a place that the average user really wants to be messing around in. For the most part that's true, but then, a part of the file system is actually used as the User Interface.
However this UI is not a critical part of the file system, in other words the Desktop and Start Menu are not really a part of the file system, but simply a link to it.
While these "Shortcuts" are labeled with little "arrows", it's never really explained what these little arrows means, and in successive versions of Windows it seems to become even more unclear.
Also it's in no way clear at all that the Start Menu is nothing but Shortcuts.
The file system even becomes more and more ambiguous as there are successively more and more shortcuts to shortcuts, and even more "system shortcuts", making it quite unclear what part of the file system is actually real.
So in MS's wisdom they attempt to protect the system from novice users, but inadvertently create an unnecessary sense of fear in the user that the user thinks they have destroyed their system.
Imagine the horror when someone has somehow deleted everything on their Desktop, thinking their computer has been erased.
Or a very strange phenomenon I witnessed once, where the Desktop was full of 100s of "shortcuts to shortcuts to shortcuts...".
So for those who need to know, the Desktop is not a place where an application "lives", it is a place where you set things (like notes), or shortcuts (like remotes) so they are easy to reach.
Just like a real desk top where your keyboard, pencil and paper sit.
Breaking your TV remote doesn't break your TV, and deleting a Desktop Shortcut doesn't mean you have to reinstall the program.
Just look in the Start Menu for another "remote" shortcut and make a copy of it.
Learn the file system and don't let MS make a dummy out of you.
This probably should be #1, but it's pretty obvious that hiding file extensions makes people dumber than a rock.
Thinking that a virus in an eMail is an image simply because of the icon or the fake .jpg extension, is a good enough example.
Egad, filenames are not descriptive comments. A filename should be a "word" and a space separates two words.
OK, so I used quotes around "word", well if you didn't use spaces in a "filename" then I wouldn't have to use quotes.
You could use spaces in a shortcut to the file (hopefully you've read #1).
You can create folders and organize your files into descriptive directories. Oh, that would mean learning something about the file system.
You could use a program that uses 4dos descriptions.
This gives you a description as long as you want, in a location that doesn't consume so much space in the window, such as the status bar or in a tool tip.
These descriptions are placed in a separate plain text file, so you can easily edit the description file itself.
Unfortunately 4dos descriptions aren't very common (too simple?), I've seen a few programs such as ACDSee use it.
You can actually pay someone to sell your eMail address to spammers. Sounds like a good deal... instead of clicking all the "Unsubscribe Me" links in the junk mail you get, you can just send it to one spammer and they'll spread it for you, or maybe they'll do nothing more than max out your credit card, what the heck, give it try.
OK, rather than just focusing on all the legal (bla-bla) issues of this brain-dead scheme, lets examine how ignorant you'd have to be to fall for it...
Let us examine the eMail message...
Return-Path: <admail.direct@unsubscribenow.net>
Received: from 128.121.221.180 ([202.99.172.147])
Make a note of the Return-Path, this is what they really claim their return address is.
HELO, they're forging my IP. Imagine someone calling you from your own phone number, someone you can trust?
In this example [202.99.172.147] has no host name and is owned by CNCGROUP Hebei province network, Beijing, China
Rather than wasting my time looking up different samples, I think we can assume they send from many different IPs from around the world, just like any other spammer.
Right here we can hit the delete button and forget about the rest, but just for fun, let's go on...
From: "UnsubscribeNow.org" <admail.direct@unsubscribenow.net>
X-MSMail-Priority: High
I skipped over the X-Mailer because I can't believe any mailer would direct-inject into my server and illegally forge my IP, so I ignore it.
They can't decide what domain to send From, so they use several just to let you know they own all of them.
The mixed case is cute, and a nice touch with the .org to make you think it's non-profit.
They mark the message as high priority so you know it's important, just in case the Subject isn't obvious enough.
Subject: Fwd: ADV: IMPORTANT: this email address is circulating... (service announcement)
Fwd? WTH? Forward means someone is forwarding a message they received.
Is this an ADV? Or is this a "(service announcement)", and once again we're reminded how important it is.
And finally, some truth in advertising, they have my email address and I'm getting spam. Well if I didn't already know, I know now.
Do we really need to go on? Well, just this once...
[UnsubscribeNow.org OLX Public Interest Announcement]
I searched for "OLX" and didn't find anything, so let's forget that.
Oh! My eMail address is Public Interest, just not the public that I'm interested in.
If you've received this message - then your email address has been screened circulating on junk-email and spam related mailing lists.
That's just an outright lie, they have no way of knowing that.
UnsubscribeNow.org spam-traps junk-email circulating online, parses multiple-recipient addresses and registers 'remove-me' links into the UnsubscribeNow.org remove-me database.
Another lie! What? you doubt me? I searched through 300 spam messages and found 25 with Cc: headers, none of which had addresses outside my domain. Now granted, I have received messages with multiple To: and Cc: addresses that probably do contain addresses outside my domain, but the number is so very small that the method they claim to use would be almost useless.
On top of that, their "spamtrap" address would have to be included in one of my eMails, so I would definitely be able to find that by searching.
Oh, remember the source IP above? Do they even have a mail server name? Surely it can't be a secret?
About CC multiple recipient email addresses.
CC is an acronym for carbon copy. In order to multiply sending rates, messages composed by bulk mailers will often use a random multiple-recipient CC addressing feature where one message is sent to batches of addresses at a single time.
Ah, here I validate my above claim. The majority of spammers use "direct injection" into the mail server, as this message here actually did, and don't use a mail server, so the Cc: header serves no purpose. The Cc: header is for your information only, the mail server doesn't even need to look at it. Multiple addresses are sent in the SMTP RCPT TO command and are not visible in the final eMail message.
The reason why Cc: headers appear in spam at all is something I don't even want to speculate on, though spam filtering comes to mind.
UnsubscribeNow.org's screening network utilizes 676 online spam-traps...
... bla-bla-bla, they got my address the same way every other spammer got my address.
Please note: This email was sent from a notify-only address that cannot accept incoming email. Please do not reply to this message.
This disclaimer is actually their attempt at humor.
The following links are provided for easy removal from our distributed advisories:
Three unsubscribe links; .info, .net, .us. Sometimes there's .com and .biz as well. Should I click on all three, why should I have to click on any? Surely if I give them my address the spam will stop?
Note that this supposedly stops them from sending me these "important announcements", at least until their huge "screening network" picks up my address again.
Oh, they have three because they want you to know they own them all!
Also on the web
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Oooh!, now we're getting serious, I'm sure they respect my privacy, because they keep sending me this crap!.
"Terms of Service"? WTH are they talking about? What service? They have terms for unsubscribing me? I don't get it.
No! I'm not gonna go read it, you think I'm a fool?
For abuse inquiries: abuse@ unsubscribenow.org
(remove space)
Heh, they made another little joke. Oh my sides are aching!
Now the HTML part contains some images, which I'm sure look real authentic (whatever that may mean), but I haven't seen them.
But here's something you don't see in the text part...
.............................. <BR>
Message forwarding by: eGlobal Planet - Managed Messaging.
7 Lesi Ukrainky Boulevard, Kiev UA
.............................. </FONT></TD>
This seems to be another joke? Please note that it won't look like that when rendered in HTML, this is exactly what the message source looks like. When rendered in HTML there will only be two lines (although table cell width may or may not force another line).
Surely there's no truth to any part of that statement.
Now I did search a little and found some interesting facts, some I had already known. Like the fact that UnsubscribeNow was once hosted on a Yahoo! server. Certainly enough people bitched that Yahoo finally was forced to kick them off.
UnsubscribeNow charges a fee, something like $25, to add your address to their "remove database". Seems they'll happily take your credit card number, but even so there's absolutely nothing they can do to stop even one piece of spam from ending up in your inbox.
Their IP [221.5.250.101] is controlled by CNC Group Chongqing province network, Beijing, China
I could link to all the blacklists they are in, but that could change and I'd have to update my links, and I just don't think it's that important.
This may be the same group that started the Sham Site scam with the "National Do Not E-mail Registry".